Embedded Evaluations and Their Stakeholders

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

Briefly describe a program that you are familiar with. 

Highlight the evaluation method(s) you believe are in place.

  • How are stakeholders capturing problems that need to be addressed?
  • What evidence of the six calibrators identified in Chapter 4 and Figure 4.2.4 of the textbook is present?
  • How are they evident?
  • What impact are they making?
  • How would you improve the evaluation process?
  • By augmenting the current calibrators?
  • Applying others?


Program Selection

Introduce a program you believe requires improvement.

  • Why did you select this program?
  • What needs is the program meant to provide or serve?
  • What are its goals and objectives?
  • Describe its operations.
  • Strategies?
  • Activities?
  • How are quality and accomplishment defined?

I chose the “Department of Immigration”  This topic will be the topic throughout the next six weeks

Public Policy Evaluation

Throughout this course, you have critiqued the development and influence of public policy. You have appraised specific justice and security issues facing American society. In this final week, you will evaluate potential conflicts involving public policy and civil rights.


In the field you, will need to be able to communicate the results of your analysis in a way that guides stakeholders through your process, extends understanding of your conclusions, and provokes questions and ideas that pave the way for future research and progress.


You have already drafted an executive summary to use as an introduction for your final narrative.


Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word addendum to your executive summary in which you describe the policy you have researched, and answer the following questions:

  • Where is this policy or program in effect and how long has it been in effect?
  • Who is in charge or writing this policy and who oversees the enforcement of this policy?
  • What are the goals of the policy and who does it benefit?
  • Does this policy affect one group of individuals more than another? Explain how.
  • Explain any changes you would make to this policy to better improve potential conflicts involving civil rights, and provide data to support your suggestions.


Headings for the paper should reflect each objective listed here. Do not combine objectives and place each objective in the order as presented in the assignment.


Cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed or similar scholarly references beyond the course texts and associated learning activities to support your assignment. Scholarly sources are publications from professional organizations that are written by academics or other experts which contribute to knowledge in a particular field. Please review the document titled, “Unacceptable web sources,” found in the Course Resources section of the classroom. Your best sources for scholarly material are the university library or possibly Google Scholar.


Include an APA-formatted reference page.


Format your executive summary according to APA guidelines. 


BibliU – Reader – Public Policy. Seventh Edition

Public Interest in Politics

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to classmates or your faculty member. 


Due Thursday

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: 

Consider the involvement of citizens in politics and public policy. 

  • Why do you think most citizens do not take more interest in politics and public policy?
  • What might increase their level of interest and participation?
  • What is their level of knowledge of public policy?
  • What would motivate you to become more active?